The main ideas in this article were processed by ChatGPT based on my notes from the course at Craig Newmark J-School in New York. The first draft of the article has been later revised by a human (It’s me, hi!), adding a personal tone and voice, and ideas that the original version left out.
And links. I’ve added so many links for additional context.
More than out of laziness, this exercise is done to show that artificial intelligence (AI) is getting extremely good at delivering decent and presentable work, but there’s still a need for edits from a human that adds some sugar and spice, to differentiate the final product from the vast amount of bland content out there, making it somewhat unique.
When AI took off as a buzzword, like the metaverse or blockchain before, I was on the fence, initially. When the AI-generated ‘magic avatars’ flooded your feed I voiced my concerns very loudly over what that meant for artists’ work and who was profiting from unreferenced work.
Seven months later, out of cynicism or simply survival instinct, I’m trying to embrace this change. AI is here to completely challenge all jobs that involve creative work or data processing, and we better cautiously adapt.
There is a clear need to legislate it, make sure there’s transparency on the datasets used and that original creative work is fairly recognized and compensated, but also an urge to welcome this inevitable shift.
Continue reading “AI for news, as written by ChatGPT”